The following table demonstrates how the top seven teams would perform in a round robin home-and-home series. The rows of the tables represent the home team. The columns represent the away teams. The score for each game is shown in the table with the color code representing the victor for each game. (My algorithm does not currently handle neutral site games, but you can approximate it by averaging home and away scores.) Gray squares represent predicted ties. We have added Cincinnati and Alabama for reference because they are considered by the public to be among the top teams.
click to enlarge image
We observe some interesting trends from this figure. First, home field advantage provides Texas, Boise State, Florida, and Pittsburgh a serious leg up on the competition. All four of these teams are undefeated at home. TCU is undefeated at home but plays a tie against Texas. The major differences between the teams are their performances against Cincinnati and Alabama. Cincinnati has the offensive firepower to keep up with Texas and TCU, forcing 24-24 ties with each, and outscore Alabama at home 24-17. Alabama has the top-ranked defense but simply lacks the offense to keep up with the top five teams, who have good, although not necessarily exceptional defenses.
Among the top seven teams, we would expect the following records for the home-and-home round robin play:
- Texas: 7-3-2
- Boise State: 8-4-0
- Florida: 8-4-0
- TCU: 6-4-2
- Pittsburgh: 8-4-0
- Cincinnati: 1-9-2
- Alabama: 1-11-0
The most important thing to note from this analysis is that, contrary to what conference partisans may suggest, the top five teams are evenly matched. Any combination of them would make an excellent championship game. We all have our own opinions about the BCS, and somebody's bound to get screwed by the system. However, don't assume that any game between any of the top five teams constitutes a fraud.