Rank | +/- | Team | WinPct | SoS | Off Pts | Def Pts | Pace |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
001 | -- | TCU | 0.9916 | 0.4635 | 26.0 | 7.5 | 84.3 |
002 | -- | Oregon | 0.9828 | 0.5298 | 26.9 | 9.9 | 87.8 |
003 | -- | Stanford | 0.9744 | 0.5474 | 26.5 | 9.8 | 83.9 |
004 | -- | Alabama | 0.9700 | 0.5514 | 25.0 | 7.5 | 78.8 |
005 | +1 | Ohio St. | 0.9530 | 0.5296 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 79.7 |
006 | -1 | Virginia Tech | 0.9489 | 0.5313 | 24.5 | 8.8 | 79.2 |
007 | -- | Boise St. | 0.9397 | 0.4592 | 27.0 | 9.8 | 84.7 |
008 | +2 | Auburn | 0.9391 | 0.5466 | 26.7 | 12.7 | 79.4 |
009 | -1 | Oklahoma | 0.9313 | 0.5444 | 24.0 | 8.3 | 85.2 |
010 | -1 | Nebraska | 0.9217 | 0.5298 | 22.3 | 9.3 | 83.5 |
011 | -- | Wisconsin | 0.9159 | 0.5333 | 26.8 | 13.8 | 81.2 |
012 | +1 | Iowa | 0.8933 | 0.5223 | 18.2 | 9.8 | 81.9 |
013 | -1 | Arkansas | 0.8903 | 0.5612 | 26.2 | 12.4 | 82.6 |
014 | +1 | West Virginia | 0.8865 | 0.5370 | 17.8 | 9.4 | 82.8 |
015 | +2 | LSU | 0.8788 | 0.5461 | 21.9 | 8.8 | 80.3 |
016 | -- | Florida | 0.8734 | 0.5565 | 23.0 | 9.3 | 80.9 |
017 | +1 | Florida St. | 0.8717 | 0.5534 | 17.9 | 10.6 | 83.3 |
018 | +1 | Oklahoma St. | 0.8485 | 0.5501 | 24.3 | 13.2 | 85.8 |
019 | +1 | Missouri | 0.8421 | 0.5202 | 18.4 | 9.1 | 87.0 |
020 | -6 | South Carolina | 0.8398 | 0.5462 | 24.5 | 12.3 | 78.9 |
021 | -- | Georgia | 0.8362 | 0.5517 | 28.0 | 11.4 | 79.7 |
022 | +1 | Miami-FL | 0.8280 | 0.5526 | 15.9 | 9.3 | 81.5 |
023 | -1 | Arizona | 0.8268 | 0.5570 | 19.5 | 9.4 | 83.5 |
024 | +1 | Arizona St. | 0.8044 | 0.5261 | 20.0 | 9.2 | 87.0 |
025 | -1 | Nevada | 0.8026 | 0.4662 | 24.3 | 15.3 | 85.1 |
New entries: None
Dropped out: None
Finalizing the regular season (minus Army-Navy), we can take a look back at RBA's performance. RBA finished 19th out of 63 algorithms, including all six BCS computers. I'm left looking back at what could have been. RBA went 69% over the second half of the season and fell back into the back from a commanding position in the first half of the season.