Today is Part III of our 2011 - 2012 bowl preview series. Today we'll examine the
- Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl
UCLA Bruins vs Illinois Fighting Illini - Belk Bowl
Louisville Cardinals vs North Carolina State Wolfpack - GoDaddy.com Bowl
Arkansas State Red Wolves vs Northern Illinois Huskies - New Era Pinstripe Bowl
Iowa State Cyclones vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights - MAACO Las Vegas Bowl
Arizona State Sun Devils vs Boise State Broncos
Full previews after the jump ....
25. Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl
Saturday, December 31 at 7:30 PM
UCLA Bruins (6 - 7; 5 - 5 Pac-12)
vs
Illinois Fighting Illini (5 - 6; 2 - 6 Big Ten)
vs
Illinois Fighting Illini (5 - 6; 2 - 6 Big Ten)
GUGS Score: 45.6
Eddie
UCLA Bruins | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.450 | 65 | 0.548 | 20 | 16.1 | 62 | 16.4 | 65 | 167.0 | 54 |
Illinois Fighting Illini | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.547 | 54 | 0.540 | 31 | 13.6 | 83 | 14.1 | 46 | 169.3 | 29 |
It's a little hard to get excited about a game between two teams with losing records against FBS with fired coaches. UCLA's problems stem from defensive consistency, where they rank 5th worst at 3.4 +/- 26.0 PPH. Luckily for the Bruins, the Illini are offensively inept, sporting a 17.9 +/- 8.6 PPH efficiency. If Illinois can get a few breaks offensively, this one can swing the other way. However, RBA expects UCLA to avoid being the first team to ever go 6-8 in a season, 28-24, with 58.4% probability.
Justin
UCLA Bruins | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.419 | 72 | 0.621 | 12 | 18.2 | 71 | 20.8 | 70 | 161.7 | 95 |
Illinois Fighting Illini | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.532 | 58 | 0.578 | 39 | 17.0 | 84 | 16.1 | 28 | 165.7 | 64 |
You can blame USC for this one. It wasn't too long ago that the Illini were amongst the ranks of the undefeated, although we were slightly skeptical. Illinois capped off their 5-0 start with an 0-6 finale, including a drubbing at the hands of Minnesota. The Illini aren't bad, per se, they just had an easy schedule at the start and a tough one at the end. Even back when they were 4-0 TFG foresaw a 7-4 season that should have happened (minus bad losses to Purdue and Minnesota). UCLA, on the other hand, were Oregon's punching bag in the first Pac-12 title game thanks to that other school in LA being on probation. Illinois has no offense but a respectable defense; UCLA has an average offense and a below-average defense. This game won't be an epic display of talent, but it should be relatively close. Illinois 30, UCLA 28 (61.3%); 163 plays.
UCLA Bruins Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/03 | 78 | / 66 | UCLA | 34 | at | 63 | / 67 | Houston | 38 | 170 | 25.5% | / 49.3% |
2011/09/10 | 117 | / 107 | SJSU | 17 | at | 73 | / 69 | UCLA | 27 | 154 | 91.3% | / 86.3% |
2011/09/17 | 24 | / 30 | Texas | 49 | at | 76 | / 76 | UCLA | 20 | 154 | 27.5% | / 24.2% |
2011/09/24 | 85 | / 77 | UCLA | 27 | at | 55 | / 82 | Oregon St. | 19 | 151 | 24.2% | / 40.7% |
2011/10/01 | 76 | / 75 | UCLA | 19 | at | 4 | / 3 | Stanford | 45 | 152 | 4.7% | / 5.3% |
2011/10/08 | 81 | / 62 | Washington St. | 25 | at | 71 | / 72 | UCLA | 28 | 157 | 64.6% | / 35.4% |
2011/10/20 | 70 | / 75 | UCLA | 12 | at | 55 | / 48 | Arizona | 48 | 180 | 27.9% | / 23.9% |
2011/10/29 | 53 | / 55 | California | 14 | at | 76 | / 79 | UCLA | 31 | 159 | 44.7% | / 41.2% |
2011/11/05 | 21 | / 12 | Arizona St. | 28 | at | 68 | / 73 | UCLA | 29 | 171 | 23.6% | / 12.5% |
2011/11/12 | 66 | / 77 | UCLA | 6 | at | 32 | / 35 | Utah | 31 | 148 | 28.8% | / 23.7% |
2011/11/19 | 94 | / 82 | Colorado | 6 | at | 73 | / 66 | UCLA | 45 | 150 | 64.1% | / 57.6% |
2011/11/26 | 64 | / 63 | UCLA | 0 | at | 20 | / 13 | USC | 50 | 151 | 22.6% | / 17.7% |
2011/12/02 | 75 | / 65 | UCLA | 31 | at | 7 | / 3 | Oregon | 49 | 183 | 9.4% | / 10.2% |
2011/12/31 | 58 | / 54 | Illinois | -- | vs | 72 | / 65 | UCLA | -- | -- | 38.7% | / 58.4% |
Illinois Fighting Illini Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/03 | 88 | / 90 | Arkansas St. | 15 | at | 40 | / 32 | Illinois | 33 | 160 | 85.6% | / 76.8% |
2011/09/17 | 33 | / 23 | Arizona St. | 14 | at | 34 | / 24 | Illinois | 17 | 164 | 59.8% | / 59.6% |
2011/09/24 | 72 | / 76 | Western Michigan | 20 | at | 34 | / 24 | Illinois | 23 | 173 | 79.8% | / 89.8% |
2011/10/01 | 75 | / 86 | Northwestern | 35 | at | 35 | / 30 | Illinois | 38 | 166 | 81.3% | / 71.4% |
2011/10/08 | 38 | / 29 | Illinois | 41 | at | 97 | / 96 | Indiana | 20 | 181 | 77.9% | / 82.7% |
2011/10/15 | 9 | / 18 | Ohio St. | 17 | at | 36 | / 33 | Illinois | 7 | 147 | 36.0% | / 72.1% |
2011/10/22 | 38 | / 37 | Illinois | 14 | at | 72 | / 74 | Purdue | 21 | 171 | 60.8% | / 76.5% |
2011/10/29 | 43 | / 46 | Illinois | 7 | at | 25 | / 36 | Penn State | 10 | 172 | 26.0% | / 48.3% |
2011/11/12 | 21 | / 28 | Michigan | 31 | at | 46 | / 45 | Illinois | 14 | 157 | 36.6% | / 30.6% |
2011/11/19 | 6 | / 6 | Wisconsin | 28 | at | 47 | / 52 | Illinois | 17 | 144 | 15.9% | / 14.4% |
2011/11/26 | 46 | / 54 | Illinois | 7 | at | 91 | / 105 | Minnesota | 27 | 154 | 78.0% | / 82.0% |
2011/12/31 | 58 | / 54 | Illinois | -- | vs | 72 | / 65 | UCLA | -- | -- | 61.3% | / 41.6% |
24. Belk Bowl
Tuesday, December 27 at 8:00 PM
Louisville Cardinals (6 - 5; 5 - 2 Big East)
vs
North Carolina State Wolfpack (5 - 5; 4 - 4 ACC)
vs
North Carolina State Wolfpack (5 - 5; 4 - 4 ACC)
GUGS Score: 47.1
Justin
Louisville Cardinals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.586 | 46 | 0.515 | 65 | 21.3 | 42 | 18.6 | 59 | 154.9 | 117 |
North Carolina State Wolfpack | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.532 | 57 | 0.533 | 59 | 19.5 | 58 | 18.6 | 57 | 165.9 | 61 |
Ahh, the Big East. The second-least-predictable conference of the BCS six. The second-most depressing part of having these two conferences in the BCS is that they've eaten up automatic bids to big bowl games that otherwise could have gone to teams like TCU, Boise State, or Utah. This game will have all the hallmarks of a Big East/ACC matchup: low pace, mediocre defense, and so-so offense. The best analogy is that this would be an 8-9 game in the NCAA tournament. In the end, though, the Cardinals have a slightly better offense and should eek out the win. Louisville 32, North Carolina St. 30 (55.3%); 160 plays.
Eddie
Louisville Cardinals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.617 | 48 | 0.494 | 71 | 14.8 | 72 | 12.5 | 30 | 166.1 | 71 |
North Carolina State Wolfpack | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.545 | 55 | 0.527 | 55 | 16.2 | 59 | 15.1 | 55 | 166.8 | 58 |
Big East versus ACC: The three-card monte of college football. All indications suggest that the game should be predictably slow when the Cardinal are on offense, as their 17.4 +/- 5.3 PPH offense faces off against the 14.6 +/- 1.0 PPH Wolfpack defense. In contrast, the other side of the ball is up in the air. NC State's offense is a respectable 23.4 +/- 14.4 PPH. Louisville's defense is slightly below average at 4.5 +/- 16.0 PPH. RBA says Louisville should prevail, 28-21, with 55.4% confidence, but we all know how three-card monte works out once the suckers show up.
Louisville Cardinals Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/09 | 82 | / 70 | FIU | 24 | at | 51 | / 46 | Louisville | 17 | 158 | 81.4% | / 82.0% |
2011/09/17 | 59 | / 53 | Louisville | 24 | at | 48 | / 50 | Kentucky | 17 | 165 | 34.1% | / 36.8% |
2011/10/01 | 99 | / 104 | Marshall | 17 | at | 51 | / 50 | Louisville | 13 | 160 | 85.3% | / 80.4% |
2011/10/08 | 60 | / 61 | Louisville | 7 | at | 40 | / 41 | North Carolina | 14 | 146 | 29.9% | / 49.1% |
2011/10/15 | 66 | / 63 | Louisville | 16 | at | 40 | / 39 | Cincinnati | 25 | 155 | 25.5% | / 36.1% |
2011/10/21 | 47 | / 46 | Rutgers | 14 | at | 65 | / 62 | Louisville | 16 | 141 | 50.9% | / 56.0% |
2011/10/29 | 65 | / 65 | Syracuse | 10 | at | 64 | / 58 | Louisville | 27 | 149 | 62.4% | / 60.0% |
2011/11/05 | 53 | / 52 | Louisville | 38 | at | 28 | / 31 | West Virginia | 35 | 165 | 28.7% | / 31.3% |
2011/11/12 | 36 | / 36 | Pittsburgh | 21 | at | 50 | / 54 | Louisville | 14 | 145 | 46.4% | / 58.1% |
2011/11/19 | 54 | / 51 | Louisville | 34 | at | 58 | / 73 | Connecticut | 20 | 167 | 54.0% | / 62.9% |
2011/11/25 | 52 | / 47 | Louisville | 34 | at | 41 | / 49 | South Florida | 24 | 160 | 45.7% | / 44.1% |
2011/12/27 | 57 | / 55 | North Carolina St. | -- | vs | 46 | / 48 | Louisville | -- | -- | 55.3% | / 55.4% |
North Carolina State Wolfpack Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/10 | 24 | / 35 | North Carolina St. | 27 | at | 88 | / 95 | Wake Forest | 34 | 163 | 75.8% | / 85.2% |
2011/09/22 | 43 | / 78 | North Carolina St. | 14 | at | 60 | / 49 | Cincinnati | 44 | 167 | 50.7% | / 73.8% |
2011/10/01 | 38 | / 38 | Georgia Tech | 45 | at | 58 | / 83 | North Carolina St. | 35 | 163 | 42.7% | / 37.2% |
2011/10/08 | 95 | / 108 | Central Michigan | 24 | at | 53 | / 70 | North Carolina St. | 38 | 162 | 82.1% | / 77.5% |
2011/10/22 | 57 | / 64 | North Carolina St. | 28 | at | 78 | / 83 | Virginia | 14 | 172 | 54.7% | / 41.7% |
2011/10/29 | 57 | / 63 | North Carolina St. | 0 | at | 16 | / 15 | Florida St. | 34 | 156 | 17.7% | / 23.0% |
2011/11/05 | 34 | / 46 | North Carolina | 0 | at | 63 | / 66 | North Carolina St. | 13 | 157 | 37.8% | / 41.0% |
2011/11/12 | 59 | / 65 | North Carolina St. | 10 | at | 87 | / 82 | Boston College | 14 | 136 | 65.3% | / 60.3% |
2011/11/19 | 27 | / 16 | Clemson | 13 | at | 62 | / 65 | North Carolina St. | 37 | 173 | 28.0% | / 27.4% |
2011/11/26 | 79 | / 110 | Maryland | 41 | at | 56 | / 56 | North Carolina St. | 56 | 187 | 65.0% | / 63.4% |
2011/12/27 | 57 | / 55 | North Carolina St. | -- | vs | 46 | / 48 | Louisville | -- | -- | 44.7% | / 44.6% |
23. GoDaddy.com Bowl
Sunday, January 8 at 9:00 PM
Arkansas State Red Wolves (9 - 2; 8 - 0 Sun Belt)
vs
Northern Illinois Huskies (9 - 3; 8 - 1 Mid-Atlantic)
vs
Northern Illinois Huskies (9 - 3; 8 - 1 Mid-Atlantic)
GUGS Score: 47.2
Eddie
Arkansas State Red Wolves | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.420 | 69 | 0.429 | 117 | 14.4 | 79 | 14.6 | 51 | 163.7 | 94 |
Northern Illinois Huskies | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.468 | 63 | 0.441 | 107 | 20.1 | 25 | 20.0 | 94 | 164.2 | 92 |
It's hard to imagine a more awful college town than Jonesboro, Arkansas (believe me, I've been there), so I can see why coach Hugh Freeze decided to jump ship to Oxford, even if it is the worst job in college football. Coaching instability makes games harder to pick, and this game was already unpredictable. NIU's offense is consistently above average at 25.2 +/- 10.2 PPH, but their defense is rivals UCLA at 9.1 +/- 21.8 PPH. It's possible that Arkansas State's offense may be able to take advantage of the Huskies' defense with their 23.7 +/- 18.6 PPH efficiency. However, it seems that the Red Wolves must do so to win because their defense isn't great at 8.2 +/- 12.8 PPH. If everything goes according to plan, Arkansas State should win 31-27 with 54.6% confidence, but one has to wonder what the coaching change will do to an already shaky offense.
Justin
Arkansas State Red Wolves | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.485 | 64 | 0.285 | 120 | 18.2 | 70 | 18.6 | 58 | 172.0 | 25 |
Northern Illinois Huskies | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.540 | 55 | 0.337 | 115 | 22.6 | 28 | 21.2 | 73 | 170.2 | 32 |
One interesting point to note here is that Eddie and I disagree about most things here: who will win, whether Northern Illinois is a 0.500 team or not, and whether or not these teams play fast or slow. TFG says these are two of the 32 fastest teams in FBS, while RBA says both fall into the bottom quarter. Another interesting point is that the Huskies actually have a respectable offense, even if it's not particularly consistent. This is going to be a close one, but TFG gives the slight nod to Northern Illinois. Northern Ill. 35, Arkansas St. 33 (55.5%); 171 plays.
Arkansas State Red Wolves Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/03 | 88 | / 90 | Arkansas St. | 15 | at | 40 | / 32 | Illinois | 33 | 160 | 14.4% | / 23.2% |
2011/09/10 | 115 | / 119 | Memphis | 3 | at | 93 | / 85 | Arkansas St. | 47 | 175 | 85.5% | / 82.6% |
2011/09/17 | 85 | / 84 | Arkansas St. | 7 | at | 11 | / 10 | Virginia Tech | 26 | 163 | 6.5% | / 5.4% |
2011/10/01 | 89 | / 80 | Arkansas St. | 26 | at | 112 | / 107 | Western Kentucky | 22 | 169 | 68.2% | / 69.6% |
2011/10/08 | 90 | / 83 | Arkansas St. | 24 | at | 113 | / 104 | LA-Monroe | 19 | 188 | 65.4% | / 73.3% |
2011/10/18 | 78 | / 61 | FIU | 16 | at | 87 | / 80 | Arkansas St. | 34 | 164 | 54.9% | / 32.3% |
2011/10/29 | 105 | / 105 | North Texas | 14 | at | 75 | / 74 | Arkansas St. | 37 | 163 | 80.4% | / 72.1% |
2011/11/05 | 74 | / 69 | Arkansas St. | 39 | at | 117 | / 116 | FL-Atlantic | 21 | 169 | 87.0% | / 89.6% |
2011/11/12 | 93 | / 89 | LA-Lafayette | 21 | at | 74 | / 72 | Arkansas St. | 30 | 188 | 67.1% | / 56.9% |
2011/11/19 | 76 | / 69 | Arkansas St. | 45 | at | 109 | / 107 | Middle Tenn. | 19 | 206 | 76.5% | / 79.1% |
2011/12/03 | 100 | / 103 | Troy | 14 | at | 67 | / 70 | Arkansas St. | 45 | 181 | 70.4% | / 65.6% |
2012/01/08 | 55 | / 63 | Northern Ill. | -- | vs | 64 | / 69 | Arkansas St. | -- | -- | 44.5% | / 54.6% |
Northern Illinois Huskies Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/03 | 84 | / 83 | Army | 26 | at | 30 | / 52 | Northern Ill. | 49 | 173 | 87.7% | / 72.1% |
2011/09/10 | 36 | / 55 | Northern Ill. | 42 | at | 99 | / 90 | Kansas | 45 | 176 | 77.1% | / 79.3% |
2011/09/17 | 13 | / 3 | Wisconsin | 49 | vs | 47 | / 64 | Northern Ill. | 7 | 160 | 23.7% | / 28.2% |
2011/10/01 | 55 | / 72 | Northern Ill. | 41 | at | 101 | / 110 | Central Michigan | 48 | 187 | 73.4% | / 77.3% |
2011/10/08 | 109 | / 111 | Kent St. | 10 | at | 62 | / 73 | Northern Ill. | 40 | 153 | 88.4% | / 85.1% |
2011/10/15 | 61 | / 66 | Western Michigan | 22 | at | 56 | / 68 | Northern Ill. | 51 | 188 | 61.6% | / 42.8% |
2011/10/22 | 48 | / 66 | Northern Ill. | 31 | at | 115 | / 110 | Buffalo | 30 | 196 | 87.0% | / 76.7% |
2011/11/01 | 58 | / 64 | Northern Ill. | 63 | at | 48 | / 49 | Toledo | 60 | 184 | 39.1% | / 41.6% |
2011/11/08 | 56 | / 61 | Northern Ill. | 45 | at | 95 | / 104 | Bowling Green | 14 | 166 | 73.2% | / 70.7% |
2011/11/15 | 107 | / 97 | Ball St. | 38 | at | 52 | / 61 | Northern Ill. | 41 | 197 | 85.8% | / 78.6% |
2011/11/25 | 113 | / 113 | Eastern Michigan | 12 | at | 55 | / 64 | Northern Ill. | 18 | 155 | 87.1% | / 88.9% |
2011/12/02 | 69 | / 66 | Ohio | 20 | vs | 55 | / 63 | Northern Ill. | 23 | 157 | 61.4% | / 50.9% |
2012/01/08 | 55 | / 63 | Northern Ill. | -- | vs | 64 | / 69 | Arkansas St. | -- | -- | 55.5% | / 45.4% |
22. New Era Pinstripe Bowl
Friday, December 30 at 3:20 PM
Iowa State Cyclones (5 - 6; 3 - 6 Big XII)
vs
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (7 - 4; 4 - 3 Big East)
vs
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (7 - 4; 4 - 3 Big East)
GUGS Score: 47.9
Justin
Iowa State Cyclones | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.421 | 71 | 0.611 | 18 | 15.6 | 95 | 17.7 | 43 | 174.5 | 16 |
Rutgers Scarlet Knights | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.560 | 53 | 0.520 | 62 | 19.2 | 62 | 17.5 | 41 | 164.2 | 73 |
One might say that the Cyclones are the reason we're having a rematch in the national title game instead of an Oklahoma State/LSU showdown (note: that would not work out well for OSU). Both teams have near-identical defenses at about 17.5 PPH, but the difference will be on offense. The Scarlet Knights have a 3.6 PPH advantage, which amounts to about six points over the course of a game. On the flip side, the Cyclones have demonstrated a penchant for upsets: four of their five victories this year have come when they were underdogs. Rutgers hasn't quite shown the same ability to play beyond their numbers, but TFG gives them a slight nod regardless. Rutgers 31, Iowa St. 27 (63.8%); 169 plays.
Eddie
Iowa State Cyclones | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.389 | 74 | 0.541 | 30 | 12.6 | 97 | 13.5 | 37 | 169.5 | 24 |
Rutgers Scarlet Knights | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.702 | 40 | 0.509 | 65 | 14.7 | 73 | 13.4 | 36 | 165.0 | 83 |
A bowl game in New York City baseball stadium in December? Whatever happened to lovely bowl destinations? Rutgers is a surprisingly respectable team at #40 in RBA's rankings. They're not great on either side of the ball, but they're consistent. The Scarlet Knight offensive efficiency is 16.4 +/- 3.3 PPH, and their defensive efficiency is 11.0 +/- 4.9 PPH. Iowa State rolls in at #74, largely due to a 4.8 +/- 17.4 PPH defense. However, their offense is a reliably lame 12.9 +/- 0.6 PPH. With neither team excelling on either side of the ball, the game is destined to be close, but RBA is fairly confident that the Cyclones will emerge victorious, 25-24, with 65.7% confidence.
Iowa State Cyclones Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/10 | 12 | / 18 | Iowa | 41 | at | 79 | / 81 | Iowa St. | 44 | 195 | 17.9% | / 16.2% |
2011/09/16 | 67 | / 71 | Iowa St. | 24 | at | 61 | / 62 | Connecticut | 20 | 174 | 35.6% | / 29.6% |
2011/10/01 | 22 | / 24 | Texas | 37 | at | 60 | / 66 | Iowa St. | 14 | 183 | 33.1% | / 24.9% |
2011/10/08 | 69 | / 75 | Iowa St. | 26 | at | 49 | / 39 | Baylor | 49 | 195 | 29.9% | / 37.6% |
2011/10/15 | 75 | / 83 | Iowa St. | 17 | at | 26 | / 28 | Missouri | 52 | 188 | 13.4% | / 24.5% |
2011/10/22 | 13 | / 13 | Texas A&M | 33 | at | 84 | / 84 | Iowa St. | 17 | 196 | 17.6% | / 16.0% |
2011/10/29 | 86 | / 76 | Iowa St. | 41 | at | 35 | / 40 | Texas Tech | 7 | 186 | 14.7% | / 25.1% |
2011/11/05 | 101 | / 93 | Kansas | 10 | at | 76 | / 77 | Iowa St. | 13 | 158 | 73.5% | / 57.1% |
2011/11/18 | 9 | / 5 | Oklahoma St. | 31 | at | 77 | / 81 | Iowa St. | 37 | 211 | 11.4% | / 17.8% |
2011/11/26 | 70 | / 74 | Iowa St. | 6 | at | 5 | / 5 | Oklahoma | 26 | 178 | 10.7% | / 8.0% |
2011/12/03 | 70 | / 74 | Iowa St. | 23 | at | 32 | / 27 | Kansas St. | 30 | 160 | 28.8% | / 24.3% |
2011/12/30 | 53 | / 40 | Rutgers | -- | vs | 71 | / 74 | Iowa St. | -- | -- | 36.2% | / 65.7% |
Rutgers Scarlet Knights Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/10 | 69 | / 77 | Rutgers | 22 | at | 37 | / 32 | North Carolina | 24 | 154 | 20.4% | / 21.5% |
2011/09/24 | 70 | / 69 | Ohio | 26 | at | 64 | / 68 | Rutgers | 38 | 165 | 64.1% | / 52.3% |
2011/10/01 | 59 | / 68 | Rutgers | 19 | at | 81 | / 74 | Syracuse | 16 | 193 | 54.9% | / 49.1% |
2011/10/08 | 28 | / 21 | Pittsburgh | 10 | at | 58 | / 59 | Rutgers | 34 | 170 | 36.2% | / 29.5% |
2011/10/15 | 51 | / 58 | Navy | 20 | at | 47 | / 47 | Rutgers | 21 | 144 | 63.0% | / 65.4% |
2011/10/21 | 47 | / 46 | Rutgers | 14 | at | 65 | / 62 | Louisville | 16 | 141 | 49.1% | / 44.0% |
2011/10/29 | 27 | / 30 | West Virginia | 41 | at | 52 | / 52 | Rutgers | 31 | 185 | 44.7% | / 24.4% |
2011/11/05 | 44 | / 51 | South Florida | 17 | at | 52 | / 54 | Rutgers | 20 | 190 | 50.1% | / 53.2% |
2011/11/12 | 91 | / 90 | Army | 12 | vs | 51 | / 48 | Rutgers | 27 | 144 | 74.8% | / 70.6% |
2011/11/19 | 38 | / 37 | Cincinnati | 3 | at | 46 | / 41 | Rutgers | 20 | 166 | 44.1% | / 35.4% |
2011/11/26 | 40 | / 39 | Rutgers | 22 | at | 63 | / 70 | Connecticut | 40 | 156 | 63.0% | / 62.0% |
2011/12/30 | 53 | / 40 | Rutgers | -- | vs | 71 | / 74 | Iowa St. | -- | -- | 63.8% | / 34.3% |
18. MAACO Las Vegas Bowl
Thursday, December 22 at 8:00 PM
Arizona State Sun Devils (5 - 6; 4 - 5 Pac-12)
vs
Boise State Broncos (11 - 1; 6 - 1 Mountain West)
vs
Boise State Broncos (11 - 1; 6 - 1 Mountain West)
GUGS Score: 52.6
Eddie
Arizona State Sun Devils | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.784 | 30 | 0.528 | 52 | 19.3 | 29 | 14.9 | 53 | 174.1 | 6 |
Boise State Broncos | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.949 | 8 | 0.462 | 95 | 25.7 | 6 | 11.6 | 21 | 168.8 | 35 |
As much as RBA loves Boise State, this game isn't even in the top five confidences in the bowl season. It entirely depends which Sun Devil team shows up. Is it the team that beat Missouri and USC or is it the team that lost to UCLA and Arizona? In those games, their defense didn't show up, which has become quite a habit lately at 10.5 +/- 8.7 PPH. (I blame Vontaze Burfict personal fouls.) However, their 24.5 +/- 10.6 PPH offense is generally good enough to keep them in games despite their defense. Boise State just keeps rocking along with Kellen Moore, sporting a 33.8 +/- 16.2 PPH offense that occasionally lets them down in big games. The Broncos have fallen in RBA's rankings largely due to a drop in defensive performance to 3.1 +/- 17.0 PPH. Despite being a pre-Christmas bowl game, this one should be pretty good, ending with a Bronco 34-31 victory with 74.4% probability.
Justin
Arizona State Sun Devils | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.629 | 38 | 0.584 | 33 | 20.9 | 45 | 16.9 | 35 | 177.7 | 10 |
Boise State Broncos | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2011 | 0.900 | 3 | 0.426 | 77 | 30.6 | 5 | 12.7 | 5 | 164.7 | 70 |
This one is slightly out-of-order thanks to it being played before part IV of our preview is published. While it's nice that the Broncos are getting pitted against a team from a BCS conference, it's kind of disappointing that it has to be a team like Arizona State. Once again the Broncos are near the top of our rankings, although this year they've only played two quality teams -- Georgia and TCU -- and went 1-1 in those games. Even with that caveat, Boise is the much better team. The Sun Devils haven't won a game since October -- not for lack of trying, as they've been competitive in all their games -- but I'm skeptical they can pull off the upset in the biggest mismatch of the bowl season. Boise St. 40, Arizona St. 28 (84.2%); 171 plays.
Arizona State Sun Devils Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/09 | 16 | / 25 | Missouri | 30 | at | 41 | / 24 | Arizona St. | 37 | 179 | 43.9% | / 55.7% |
2011/09/17 | 33 | / 23 | Arizona St. | 14 | at | 34 | / 24 | Illinois | 17 | 164 | 40.2% | / 40.4% |
2011/09/24 | 23 | / 29 | USC | 22 | at | 35 | / 20 | Arizona St. | 43 | 161 | 50.7% | / 60.9% |
2011/10/01 | 61 | / 87 | Oregon St. | 20 | at | 30 | / 15 | Arizona St. | 35 | 185 | 79.2% | / 80.4% |
2011/10/08 | 32 | / 11 | Arizona St. | 35 | at | 31 | / 34 | Utah | 14 | 168 | 39.6% | / 52.6% |
2011/10/15 | 25 | / 12 | Arizona St. | 27 | at | 7 | / 6 | Oregon | 41 | 186 | 21.8% | / 26.7% |
2011/10/29 | 91 | / 81 | Colorado | 14 | at | 23 | / 14 | Arizona St. | 48 | 169 | 92.2% | / 86.1% |
2011/11/05 | 21 | / 12 | Arizona St. | 28 | at | 68 | / 73 | UCLA | 29 | 171 | 76.4% | / 87.5% |
2011/11/12 | 28 | / 19 | Arizona St. | 27 | at | 88 | / 80 | Washington St. | 37 | 179 | 81.5% | / 86.6% |
2011/11/19 | 61 | / 58 | Arizona | 31 | at | 31 | / 28 | Arizona St. | 27 | 200 | 67.4% | / 67.5% |
2011/11/25 | 45 | / 41 | California | 47 | at | 34 | / 29 | Arizona St. | 38 | 163 | 56.1% | / 60.4% |
2011/12/22 | 3 | / 8 | Boise St. | -- | vs | 38 | / 30 | Arizona St. | -- | -- | 15.8% | / 25.6% |
Boise State Broncos Season Summary
Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011/09/03 | 23 | / 24 | Georgia | 21 | vs | 2 | / 3 | Boise St. | 35 | 159 | 84.9% | / 66.8% |
2011/09/16 | 2 | / 4 | Boise St. | 40 | at | 65 | / 69 | Toledo | 15 | 181 | 89.8% | / 96.4% |
2011/09/24 | 52 | / 54 | Tulsa | 21 | at | 2 | / 5 | Boise St. | 41 | 162 | 93.1% | / 89.8% |
2011/10/01 | 45 | / 56 | Nevada | 10 | at | 2 | / 6 | Boise St. | 30 | 159 | 91.2% | / 91.0% |
2011/10/07 | 2 | / 7 | Boise St. | 57 | at | 72 | / 74 | Fresno St. | 7 | 161 | 90.9% | / 91.9% |
2011/10/15 | 2 | / 7 | Boise St. | 63 | at | 109 | / 106 | Colorado St. | 13 | 162 | 98.2% | / 98.1% |
2011/10/22 | 62 | / 57 | Air Force | 26 | at | 3 | / 7 | Boise St. | 37 | 158 | 95.9% | / 90.0% |
2011/11/05 | 3 | / 6 | Boise St. | 48 | at | 113 | / 120 | UNLV | 21 | 158 | 98.6% | / 98.8% |
2011/11/12 | 9 | / 12 | TCU | 36 | at | 3 | / 8 | Boise St. | 35 | 162 | 71.4% | / 70.4% |
2011/11/19 | 3 | / 9 | Boise St. | 52 | at | 63 | / 57 | SDSU | 35 | 184 | 90.6% | / 87.9% |
2011/11/26 | 89 | / 83 | Wyoming | 14 | at | 3 | / 8 | Boise St. | 36 | 155 | 94.9% | / 92.6% |
2011/12/03 | 120 | / 117 | New Mexico | 0 | at | 4 | / 8 | Boise St. | 45 | 160 | 99.4% | / 99.3% |
2011/12/22 | 3 | / 8 | Boise St. | -- | vs | 38 | / 30 | Arizona St. | -- | -- | 84.2% | / 74.4% |
Follow us on Twitter at @TFGridiron.